Skip to main content

Is “Amnesty International” a Human Rights Organisation?

Is "Amnesty International"  a Human Rights Organisation?


The simple answer is NO


Amnesty International has never highlighted the war crimes committed by Kagame inside Rwanda and the Hutus genocide committed in D.R. Congo. This is because the organisations is based in the UK and funded by British people. Highlighting these human rights violations could have prevented Amnesty International from access to  funding  from  UK government and British public. Amnesty International is not a Human Rights Organisation. Most of the work they do is the bureaucracy  of general reporting about issues and events that have already taken place.


Comments

  1. Amnesty International usual writes vague and general statements about human rights issues. All British NGOs, media and politicians have jobs in Rwanda. They are unable to point out human rights crimes committed by Kagame in Rwanda and RD Congo, and the continuous discrimination of Hutus communities in Rwanda in economic and political sectors.

    To keep their jobs, the British NGOs, media and politicians only praise Kagame for economic achievements using British aid. This campaign for Kagame is to cover up his war crimes and human rights abuses. For the last 16 year, they have been saying that Kagame and his soldiers are hero and disciplined. Therefore, they are allowed to continue to fight in DR Congo to kill innocent people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

IRIN - Great Lakes

UN News Centre - Africa