Clinton is wrong and he is lost.
Rwanda claims that 1,000,000 Tutsi were killed by the genocide. Clinton says that he could have saved 300,000 Tutsi ( without Hutu). So, who could have saved the 700,000 Tutsi ?
Did the genocide take place from refugee camps in Zaire or before people fled to Zaire to settle in these camps ?
Will now Kagame continue to point out his finger to France while Clinton admits his role in the Rwandan genocide ?
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100546207
Former U.S. president Bill Clinton admitted that if the U.S. had gone into Rwanda sooner following the start of the 1994 genocide, at least a third or roughly 300,000 lives could have been saved.
Speaking to CNBC Meets' Tania Bryer, Clinton explained that the failure of his administration to act during the genocide, which claimed the lives of around a million Rwandans, was one of the reasons behind the establishment of the Clinton Foundation.
"If we'd gone in sooner, I believe we could have saved at least a third of the lives that were lost...it had an enduring impact on me."
While Clinton added that the U.S. didn't have the same presence in Africa in 1994 that it does now, if he had sent around 10,000 troops into the country thousands of lives could have been spared.
In the 19 years since the atrocities, many historians and analysts have criticized the inactivity of the U.S. and other Western nations for not supporting the small UN peacekeeping force in Rwanda at the time.
Classified documents released in 2004 revealed that the Clinton administration knew of a "final solution to eliminate all Tutsis" well in advance of the genocide.
In a reference to the tribal tensions between the Hutus and Tutsis that were at the center of the genocide, Clinton explained the Foundation's goals: "I want people to revel in our diversity and respect it without thinking that we have to refer to each other in negative terms. That is, I can be proud of my heritage without dismissing yours."
Clinton said he was proud of other international efforts during his eight-year presidency between 1993 and 2001, including peace efforts in the Middle East which culminated in the 1993 Oslo Accords and the Northern Ireland Good Friday agreement, as well as the resolution of the Bosnian War.
"We tried to pull the world together. I think that's a good model for America's world today…Make it work for everybody, prove what the role of government is, and then just try to keep pulling things together by building new networks," he said. "You can't stop every bad thing from happening."
Former U.S. president Bill Clinton admitted that if the U.S. had gone into Rwanda sooner following the start of the 1994 genocide, at least a third or roughly 300,000 lives could have been saved.
Speaking to CNBC Meets' Tania Bryer, Clinton explained that the failure of his administration to act during the genocide, which claimed the lives of around a million Rwandans, was one of the reasons behind the establishment of the Clinton Foundation.
"If we'd gone in sooner, I believe we could have saved at least a third of the lives that were lost...it had an enduring impact on me."
While Clinton added that the U.S. didn't have the same presence in Africa in 1994 that it does now, if he had sent around 10,000 troops into the country thousands of lives could have been spared.
In the 19 years since the atrocities, many historians and analysts have criticized the inactivity of the U.S. and other Western nations for not supporting the small UN peacekeeping force in Rwanda at the time.
Classified documents released in 2004 revealed that the Clinton administration knew of a "final solution to eliminate all Tutsis" well in advance of the genocide.
In a reference to the tribal tensions between the Hutus and Tutsis that were at the center of the genocide, Clinton explained the Foundation's goals: "I want people to revel in our diversity and respect it without thinking that we have to refer to each other in negative terms. That is, I can be proud of my heritage without dismissing yours."
Clinton said he was proud of other international efforts during his eight-year presidency between 1993 and 2001, including peace efforts in the Middle East which culminated in the 1993 Oslo Accords and the Northern Ireland Good Friday agreement, as well as the resolution of the Bosnian War.
"We tried to pull the world together. I think that's a good model for America's world today…Make it work for everybody, prove what the role of government is, and then just try to keep pulling things together by building new networks," he said. "You can't stop every bad thing from happening."
__._,_.___
Kagame wanted the genocide as the only way to accessing power. Clinton supported him in this way . Kagame worked hard to ensure Rwandan people are massacred during the war he launched and sustained with the support from Uganda, UK and USA. There was no reason for USA not to intervene in Rwanda, a part from supporting Kagame military to fuel the genocide and take power, the result that UK, USA and Uganda wanted to happen.
ReplyDeleteWhile Clinton admits his role in the Rwandan genocide, the dictator and war criminal Paul Kagame has never accused the USA for having failed to intervene in Rwanda to stip the genocide.
USA, UK and Uganda are important allies of Kagame to commit genocide.