Skip to main content

UK and US mining companies are fueling war in DR Congo

UK and US mining companies are fueling war in DR Congo
All minerals available in Rwanda are traded by UK and US mining companies operating in DR Congo
 
Google translation from:
 
http://www.africatime.com/rdc/nouvelle.asp?no_nouvelle=693844&no_categorie =
 
 
"The Congolese government has seized the USA and the UK for mining companies in their respective countries do not buy minerals in Rwanda that are most often looted in eastern DRC

The attention of the national and international community focused on the mini-summit in New York held on 27 September under the chairmanship of Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon. Mini-summit which will discuss problems and solutions Kivu to consider for a lasting peace in the Great Lakes region.

There are only six days to maturity. These foundations of New York may be a big disappointment for the Congolese people who aspire to peace, order and security within its borders. This is because, over the days, about some country representatives of the international community are not much in favor of theses Kinshasa. Through these words, we feel that these countries, although some of them have decided to set aside part of their cooperation with Rwanda, stubbornly argue that a political solution to the eastern DRC is a priority.

The German ambassador to the UN said no to sanctions against Rwanda. In our delivery yesterday, we wrote that the Deputy Secretary General in charge of operations of peacekeeping Herve Ladsous presented the report of his journey in the Great Lakes region which had led successively in Kinshasa, Goma, Kigali and Kampala. Besides the fact that the administration has condemned parallel established by the M 23, he clearly stated that "it must be clear to rebuild trust, particularly between the DRC and Rwanda."

For the German diplomat, "dialogue, confidence-building and cooperation between Kigali and Kinshasa are urgently needed to address the roots of conflict." As can be seen, some countries are not in favor of sanctions against Rwanda although the charges against him are substantiated by facts and palpable.

We know all the time that Rwanda is not a mining country. Nature has not given this chance as the DRC or the other. However, Rwanda finds himself curiously among the major exporters of minerals without producing. Morality: all these minerals sold on his behalf from the DRC, and Rwanda them through armed groups that finance the rest. Most buyers are American and British companies.
These mining companies in question they obey the orders of their respective governments? The government acted, the USA and the UK react. The ball is in their court. Congress responded to the petition of religious leaders on the war in the eastern DRC.

Indeed, the U.S. Congress convened and heard turn the Sub-Secretary of State for African Affairs, Vice President of International Crisis Group and the Bishop Pierre Tambo, president of Methodist churches of Congo and co-initiator Petition against Rwanda. Following this hearing, the U.S. Congress will pass a resolution that the Obama administration will apply ... "

http://www.africatime.com/rdc/nouvelle.asp?no_nouvelle=693844&no_categorie =
 
 
 

Comments

  1. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway to access to power in Rwanda, to help Museveni and the British create and Anglophone super state that includes Rwanda, Burundi and D.R.Congo and to continue the fighting for the regime change in DR.Congo that will lead to easier access to minerals in RD Congo and to the implementation of the UK and Museveni’s plans for East African Political Federation. Maybe you are right about all of these, but you may ask what Museveni and francophone did for the Rwandans.No one is happy with the genocide it was the worst.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, I meant what Juvenal did for Rwandans

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

IRIN - Great Lakes

UN News Centre - Africa