Skip to main content

In defence of Rwanda’s political freedoms and human rights


In defence of Rwanda's political freedoms and human rights

By Asuman Bisiika

Posted  Saturday, February 8  2014 at  02:00
IN SUMMARY
Whereas the president's handlers say he speaks his mind, the framed portrayal by accusers is that of a brazen insensitive ruler.

At the end of January, the United Nations Special Rapporteur published a report of his findings on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association in Rwanda. It carried a Kigali dateline. After the banal entreaties about the good governance practices by the government of Rwanda, the report went into particular incidents manifesting a tight political system.
Like most national constitutions, the Rwandan Constitution provides for freedom of peaceful assembly, political plurality and other aspects of civil liberties.
The law, however, demands that prior to holding a demonstration, the organisers of the demonstration must notify (and obtain authorisation from) the state. The UN rapporteur says "this creates an inherent contradiction in requiring both prior notification and authorisation, paving the way for arbitrary decisions by the concerned authorities".
The rapporteur observed that peaceful protests, voicing dissent and criticising government policies are not allowed. But "peaceful assemblies which authorities favour are allowed to take place; such as the commemoration marches organised by Ibuka, which are also facilitated by the authorities". He adds: "For instance, students who presented a petition to the Prime Minister protesting against the reduction of scholarships were arrested for illegal demonstration.
In addition, Mr Sylvain Sibomana, Secretary General of the Unified Democratic Forces FDU-Inkingi, was arrested with a fellow party member outside a courtroom while attending the trial of Ms Victoire Ingabire, Chair of the same party. They both wore T-shirts with the inscription "democracy and justice". Mr Sibomana was injured by law enforcement officials in the course of his arrest.
But we have heard and seen all that on the African continent; even as nearer home as in our fair East African Community. So, we ask, why the obsession with Rwanda when most African countries are not any different from Rwanda in the area of political freedoms?
In fact if one read this report without knowing that it is about Rwanda, one could as well think it was written about Uganda. Let us face it, in East Africa, the only country in which the political opposition is enjoying a respectable level of political freedoms is Kenya.
Even in Tanzania, the so-called kisiwa kya amaani (the island of peace), the state still treats the opposition in a manner that contradicts provisions of the Constitution. Then you ask yourself, why is this obsession with Rwanda?
In my narrow assessment, I think Rwanda attracts scrutiny because in most cases, the state responds to these reports (in the thinking that these people would appreciate the Rwandan explanations). Rwandan government officials are very passionate about defending their government.
The president almost always responds to accusations that Rwanda has a bad record of human rights and political freedoms. And when he responds, he speaks with so much candour and frankness that it borders on the undiplomatic. And the media enjoys that. Whereas the president's handlers say he speaks his mind, the framed portrayal by accusers is that of a brazen insensitive ruler.
Anecdote Ms Victoire Ingabire, Mr Sylvain Sibomana and Mr Anselme Mutuyimana are senior members of FDU-Inkingi political party (not registered yet). Mr Bernard Ntaganda is from PS Imberakuri. They are all serving sentences ranging from 4 to 15 years. But the law governing political parties says that a sentence of five years and above in prison comes with a ban from holding any leadership position in any political party.
With a ban from holding any political office, the centre of gravity for the above cases has shifted from legal arguments to morality. But Rwandan government officials still argue the law…; disregarding the morality of the sentences. 

Mr Bisiika is the executive editor of East Africa Flagpost.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[RwandaLibre] Rwanda : 19 ans après les massacres de Kibeho restent toujours impunis

  http://www.fdu-rwanda.com/ Rwanda : 19 ans après les massacres de Kibeho restent toujours impunis avril 22, 2014     Ce 22 avril 2014 est un triste anniversaire. Souvenons-nous, en effet, c'est à cette date que plus de 8'000 réfugiés dans le camp de Kibeho furent tués à l'arme lourde et aux lance-roquettes des soldats du Front Patriotique Rwandais. Des dizaines de milliers de rescapés du camp qui ont tenté ensuite de s'échapper ont été froidement abattus sur leur chemin de retour, les uns, jetés dans des fosses communes, d'autres, jonchés tout le long des routes, d'autres enfin, tout simplement disparus, sans la moindre trace.   Le camp de réfugiés de Kibeho abritait près de 200000 personnes. Que l'on se rappelle, c'est peu avant le 17 avril 1995 que, sous le prétexte fallacieux de démantèlement de prétendus arsenaux d'armes, six bataillons de l'armée du FPR (2000 hommes) et de la...

[AfricaRealities.com] Rwanda court hears case to block third presidential term

  Wednesday's supreme court case was quickly adjourned after the lawyer for the Democratic Green Party failed to appear. One party official told Reuters lawyers had been fearful about taking on the case.  The court panel of nine judges led by Chief Justice Sam Rugege adjourned and set the next hearing for July 29. http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0PI11X20150708?irpc=932 Email Facebook Twitter By Clement Uwiringiyimana KIGALI (Reuters) - Rwanda's main opposition party opened a case in the Supreme Court on Wednesday seeking to prevent constitutional change that would allow President Paul Kagame to run for a third term seven-year in office. The debate about term limits and challenges to veteran leaders has flared in several places in Africa. The United States and other Western nations have been pressing African leaders to stick to constitutional rules on presidential terms. Wednesday's supreme court case was quickly adjourned...

[AfricaWatch] Rwanda 2014: 24 years after the Ugandan invasion

  http://sfbayview.com/2014/rwanda-2014-24-years-after-the-ugandan-invasion/#.U1cA6yfqdSQ.facebook Rwanda 2014: 24 years after the Ugandan invasion April 17, 2014 4 by  Ann Garrison KPFA Evening News, broadcast April 13, 2014 Claude Gatebuke survived the mass killing in Rwanda and founded the African Great Lakes Action Network (AGLAN) to promote truth and reconciliation in Rwanda and the rest of the Great Lakes Region of Africa. Twenty-four years after the Ugandan invasion of Rwanda in October 1990, both the history of the four-year war that followed and realities of life on the ground in Rwanda today are fiercely disputed. Claude Gatebuke survived the violence and founded the African Great Lakes Action Network (AGLAN) to promote truth and reconciliation in Rwanda and the rest of the Great Lakes Region of Africa. Transcript KPFA Evening News Anchor Anthony Fest : The United Nations commemorated the mass killing that came to be known ...

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

IRIN - Great Lakes

UN News Centre - Africa